SHOP ONLINE NOW

+ Cleaning Cupboard
+ Personal Care
+ Water Filters
+ Organic Food
+ Unique Gifts
+ Vitamin & Supplements
+ Animal Care
+ Amy's Consulting
+ Baby Care

New! Search All Of My Articles By Topic With Quick and Easy Links

If you like these articles, please link to them, instead of copying them. Thank you.

Green Living Now News, Edition Twenty-Seven

1. Conventional Apples: The Fruit With the Highest Amount of Pesticide Residue

By Amy Todisco

It used to be that an apple a day kept the doctor away. These days, not so much… According to the latest information from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), conventional apples have the highest rate of pesticide contamination (or their breakdown products) in 98% of the samples tested. In fact, there were 36 different pesticides found on one sample apple. And, think of how much apple juice, applesauce, and apple slices babies and young children typically ingest.

The Environmental Working Group, in their "Pesticides in Produce guide" (http://www.foodnews.org/reduce.php) rate apples as number two on the list of highest pesticide residues and peaches as number one. The next eight are as follows: sweet bell peppers, celery, nectarines, strawberries, cherries, pears, imported grapes, spinach and lettuce.

Why should you be concerned?

Pesticide manufacturers will tell you that there is no conclusive evidence that a specific pesticide can harm you. But, that's because they haven't tested the health effects of smaller doses, the way we are normally exposed. They also aren't considering the multiple exposures we get from all of the different things that we eat, drink, use in our homes, and receive from the outdoor environment. If pesticides, by their very nature, are intended to kill living organisms, does it make any sense to think that they won't impact us?

There are two reasons why it's so difficult to link human harm conclusively to toxic chemicals like pesticides.

First, most safety tests do not look at the low dose exposures to pesticide and chemical mixtures that we all experience. Since these low dose tests aren't done, chemical manufacturers claim safety because no one has demonstrated conclusively that any harm has occurred. Usually high dose studies are used to find the obvious toxic effects. Sadly, the manufacturers do not even seem to be aware that humans are more vulnerable at critical periods of development (such as in utero. See: http://www.foodnews.org/reduce.php), which science is finally starting to uncover. Just because someone doesn't believe, or want to believe, that pesticides and other toxic chemicals can harm them, doesn't mean that they don't. Ignorance does not protect us.

Second, it is nearly impossible to trace a health reaction to a specific chemical, since we are all contaminated with trace levels of literally hundreds of chemicals. Clearly there are certain chemicals, such as PCBs, mercury, dioxin and lead, which have been shown to have significant permanent adverse effects on learning, behavior, and development at low doses. (For more information on our chemical body burden, check out this site: http://www.chemicalbodyburden.org/whatisbb.htm#What%20are%20the%20health%20effects%20of%20this%20body%20burden)

We do have people in our modern society who are like the canaries in the coal mine. People with multiple chemical sensitivities often demonstrate clear reactions to common household cleaning products, or perfume, paint, and any number of other chemical products. I think of all of us as rain barrels. Every time we are exposed to a toxic chemical, the (toxic) water level in our barrels rises. At some point, once the level reaches the top and the water overflows, we start to see significant health reactions. That's not to say that we don't see health effects when the barrel is only half full. Perhaps we don't realize what is causing those symptoms, nor does our doctor, and we take a pill or some other substance to make the symptoms go away. But, does it really go away? And, what if that symptom goes away for a while, but something else more irritating and debilitating takes it's place because we keep on eating the pesticide laden foods, or breathing the formaldehyde from our new carpets and pressed wood kitchen cabinets, or absorbing the chemicals from our deodorants and shampoos?

That's why looking at the whole picture makes so much sense to me. If we have the ability to control what we expose ourselves to-at least to some extent-doesn't it make sense to do that? Even if some day it's proven that toxic synthetic chemicals have no harmful effects on humans, then what have we lost? Nothing. However, if Scientists finally do the needed studies on low dose exposures of the myriad of chemicals in our everyday products and lives, and we find out how much they have altered our health, or our genetics, then what? By then it's too late to do much to reverse the damage.

Doesn't the Government regulate these toxic chemicals?

Very slowly. It seems to take forever to get a toxic chemical, or product off the market once it's been determined that it's unsafe. The Government was telling us that chemicals like DDT, dursban, and chlordane were safe right up until the day they banned them, according to the Environmental Working Group (http://www.foodnews.org/reduce.php).

What to do?

· Choose local, organically grown produce, dairy and meat
· If not available, choose organically raised produce, dairy and meat, but look for another certifying label beyond the USDA. Some good ones are the California Organic Farmers Association, or Oregon Tilth, or one of the Northeast Organic Farming Association's (VT, MA, NH, NY, NJ, and CT).
· Grow your own organic food.
· Trade with neighboring organic farmers.
· Join a Community Supported Agriculture Group that raises organic produce

Be very wary of buying "organic" food at places like Walmart . A three month investigation foud that they were labeling non-organic food as organic, and selling brands, such as Horizon and Aurora Farms, which are on a boycott (http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/oca/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=4756)list from the Organic Consumers Association for not really being organic. Those farms are more like conventional factory farms with a little bit of access to real grass. Also, as I understand it, they are purchasing "organic" products from China and other countries that have less stringent standards than we have here.

ALERT UPDATE from the Organic Consumers Association (6/23/2007): "Despite receiving more than ten thousand comments from consumers and family farmers opposing various aspects of a late May 2007 proposal, the USDA has approved an interim rule that will allow 38 new non-organic ingredients to be allowed in products bearing the "USDA Organic" seal.

The USDA's passage of this proposal has resulted in the following:

-Anheuser Busch will be allowed to sell its "Organic Wild Hops Beer" without using any organic hops at all.

-Sausages, brats, and breakfast links labeled as "USDA Organic" are now allowed to contain intestines from factory farmed animals raised on chemically grown feed, synthetic hormones, and antibiotics.

-Products labeled as "USDA Organic" and containing fish oil may contain toxins such as PCBs and mercury (note: nonorganic fishoil products have this same risk, but despite the USDA ruling, it is against the National Organic Standards to allow such toxins in organic foods). "

http://www.foodnews.org/reduce.php

http://v.mercola.com/blogs/public_blog/Wal-Mart-Gets-Stronger-While-America-Gets-Weaker-21289.aspx

New addition: A new study shows that organic food may be better for your heart than conventional. Read the article here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6272634.stm

2. Movie Review of Michael Moore's Movie, "Sicko"

By Amy Todisco

Imagine accidentally cutting off two fingers with your table saw and realizing that you have no health insurance. When you get to the hospital you are told that your ring finger will cost $12K to reattach, and the middle finger will cost $60K. What do you do?

And, what if you are a 24 year old single mother with two children who finds out she has uterine cancer, but the insurance company denies your claim because they said you were too young to have this type of cancer.

Or, perhaps you are a rescue worker who was not on the NYC payroll when 9/11 happened, but volunteered to help in the rescue effort. Now you have a horrible respiratory illness, but the government won't cover your health care expenses because you weren't on the payroll at that time. Talk about no good deed going unpunished.

These are some of the heart wrenching stories Michael Moore shares in his new movie, Sicko, which I recently saw. I thought this was the best movie Mr. Moore has made thus far.

Clearly, we have a problem with our healthcare system. The fact that it is set up as a for-profit means that by law the insurance companies must make a profit for their shareholders. But, to make a profit they need to provide as little healthcare as possible so that they can increase their profits. One of the most powerful moments in the movie for me came when an excerpt of physician, Laura Peeno's, testimony before Congress was played. She admitted that her denial of an insurance claim for treatment for a patient resulted in his death. And, no one had held her accountable for it. Instead she was rewarded with a promotion and six-figure salary. As far as the insurance company was concerned, she saved them $500,000, and that was a good thing. Unfortunately, this seems to be the norm in the health care industry in the United States.

"Sicko" points out many instances where people who had health insurance were denied coverage for a variety of serious health conditions. One young woman with two kids moved to Canada and found a man to be her "common law" husband so she could get coverage. Another couple had to move in with their adult daughter and her family because they'd lost everything trying to pay for her cancer treatments and his heart attacks. Michael Moore's uncle and aunt, who live in Canada, were filmed and interviewed at their local Sears store buying health insurance before they entered the United States. They didn't want to come here, even for a few hours, without health insurance because it was too risky. The stories go on and on.

What was fascinating was to see how things are different in other countries, specifically France, the UK, Canada and Cuba. All four countries have free quality healthcare for their citizens. In the UK, one doctor interviewed discussed the fact that he is paid more if his patients achieve certain health benchmarks, such as quitting smoking and losing weight. In our country, people are prescribed expensive medications to "treat" their symptoms. Wellness is not something that our health care industry seems to be in favor of. In fact, they are trying to regulate our ability purchase vitamins and other supplements, but I digress…

Michael Moore does a skillful job of pointing out some of the main problems with our healthcare system, while touting the benefits of universal health care in other countries. Certainly, universal health care is not without its problems, though we don't really hear about any these in the movie. And, even if everything that was shared about the healthcare in the UK, France, Canada, and Cuba wasn't true (which is not the case), "Sicko" would still deliver an incredibly powerful message-we all must work together to improve our healthcare system here. We must focus on the "We" instead of the current focus on the "Me". Capitalism may have its good points; but it does not have any place in our health care system--especially in a country where we have four health care lobbyists to every Congress member.

This movie was truly inspiring, entertaining, and thought provoking. I hope it helps bring about change in the U.S. healthcare system. In any event, France sounds like it may be a great place to retire someday…

Sources:

http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/295/17/2037
http://youtube.com/watch?v=dgNkdATthKQ

It's free to subscribe to my monthly newsletter.

Sign up for Green Living Expert, Amy Todisco's,
free E-newsletter and you'll receive well-researched,
useful, newsworthy information, and some free surprises,
to help you "green" up your indoor spaces and improve
your life. Your e-mail address will never be shared, rented
or sold. Your privacy is guaranteed.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter now:

Any Questions? Don't hesitate to contact me, Amy Todisco,
Editor in Chief, and Owner of Green Living Now, LLC,
at: amy@greenlivingnow.com